Because no one reads blogs on the weekend... here's a political post PDF Print E-mail
Written by OHmommy   
Saturday, 01 August 2009 23:16

I. Don't. Agree.

And I want people to know my personal opinion on where President Obama is taking health care. I am neither a republican or a democrat but I am a proud American born outside of the States whose parents immigrated to this country for a better life.

For their children. And mine. And their future children.

Nearly one year ago on our European vacation, my son fell in front of the Eiffel tower and sliced his forehead open exposing tiny fragments of fat tissues oozing out. We needed a doctor. My husband and the team of Eiffel Tower security called the French paramedics and we were whisked away in a free ambulance ride to THE best children's hospital in Paris.

Heh. Four hours after the ambulance dropped us off, a doctor finally saw us. Hemming and hawing and joking about being interrupted it took him all of three minutes to stitch my son up. I won't bore you with the details of THE best children's hospital in Paris (government managed health care) needless to say you wouldn't want your children there.

Last November my daughter needed surgery. Just days after her diagnosis she was better than new while another mother in Canada (government managed health care) needed to wait weeks for the same surgery for her son.

Our neighbor, an extremely respected Cleveland Clinic doctor originally from Canada rushed his father for a hip replacement at the Clinic since the Canadian government told him to "wait" for six months. SIX MONTHS until he could comfortably walk again.

My parents while living in Poland (communist government managed health care) in the early 80s paid cash, under the table, for better faster health care for my baby sister and I even for the common flu to expedite medication.

I finally had proper health care when I turned 21. My parents, as immigrants to the United States with three children, did not have health insurance and paid cash on a need-to-go basis and thankgoodness someone was looking out for us and nothing traumatic happened.

And so. I am very interested in our nation's health care as the child of immigrants and a wife to a doctor. I strongly agree that our country needs change however I don't like where this health care bill is going.  At all.

Do you know? Do you know that Congress and their families will be excluded from receiving the same benefits as you and I under the new government run  "House Health Care Bill?"  (A government managed health care) That fact, in itself, is incredibly disheartening and makes me frown.

 

No I didn't read all 1300 pages of the bill, even Congress is having a hard time with that.  But, when Jill included the following tidbits on her blog, I knew I needed to add some notes:


Pg 53- Severability “If any provision of the Act, or any application of such provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of the provisions of this Act and the application of the provision to any other person or circumstance shall not be affected.”
(HEH... THAT'S WHAT I TELL MY KIDS ALL THE TIME... )

Pg 42 - The “Health Choices Commissioner” will choose your HC Benefits for you.

Pg 58 - Govt will have real-time access to individual’s finances & a National ID Healthcard will be issued!

Pg 59 lines 21-24- Govt will have direct access to your bank accounts for electronic funds transfer
(NICE!!! )

Pg 124 lines 24-25 No company can sue GOVT on price fixing. No “judicial review” against Govt Monopoly.

pg 127 Lines 1-16- RE: Doctors- The Govt will tell YOU what you can make.

Pg 195 -Officers & employees of HC Admin (GOVT) will have access to ALL Americans financial/personal records. (SERIOUSLY????)

Pg 203 Line 14-15- “The tax imposed under this section shall not be treated as tax.”
(Yes, can you believe...  it actually says that)

Pg 241 Line 6-8- Doctors, doesn’t matter what specialty you have, you’ll all be paid the same.
(Dude. Why encourage your children to become something MORE?)

Pg 430 Lines 11-15- The Govt will decide what level of treatment you will have at end of life.

 



Seriously? I have no words.  For the love of this country, I hope something was lost in translation.

 

I do think that we need change in this country; but me, a little stay-at-home-mother born in Poland with no political background who chronicles her children lives online as a hobby is royally pissed off.  I didn't come to this country for the government to "have access to all Americans financial records" and tell my children that is doesn't "matter what speciality you have, you'll all be paid the same."

 

What do I tell my children?  "Children, I came to this country for a better life.  So... work as hard as you can in school and get into Harvard Med School and then work even harder; but, it actually doesn't really matter because you will get paid the same as a non-specialist and the government will keep track of your JCrew receipts and you will have to wait for weeks to get a hip replacement approved by the government?"  Heh.

 

Hey, President Obama.  I want the same health care plan that you and Congress are getting.

Last Updated on Sunday, 02 August 2009 13:15
 

Comments  

 
# Tiaras 2009-08-02 00:54
Darling girl - bravo . . . (prior to becoming a SAHM, I traveled extensively in Europe and had many colleagues from Canada, Europe & Asia . . . the USA HAS the best system available and any native of those countries will tell you that, as you are well aware)

BUT I lived in China & healthcare IS NOT FAST OR FREE!!

Now, I think you should mail this to the White House and your local Congress!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Maura 2009-08-02 01:04
I agree that there are going to be aspects of any healthcare reform that we don't like. I don't necessarily think that government-run healthcare here will become just like systems in other countries. So, I'm conflicted. I think we all need to read more about it and make our opinions known.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Piper of Love 2009-08-02 01:04
I'm in complete agreement, and admire you for writing this.

Government should NOT control our healthcare.

Bravo!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Mr Lady 2009-08-02 01:06
Tiaras, I don't know one native Canadian who would trade with the US for health care, not one.

I love you, dude, and holy crap, you went political. I completely disagree with you on 90% of this, but I'm proud of you for laying it out there.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Denese Gardner 2009-08-02 01:09
Great post - and thanks for talking politics for a little change of pace :-) I was horribly sick while visiting France a few years ago. My husband and I were appalled at their "healthcare" system. Thank God I managed to recover without needing any medical attention...I can only imagine how awful it would have been. I pray (PRAY) our country is smart enough to avoid the mistakes so many others have made (and can't seem to get out of!).
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Dana 2009-08-02 01:20
Bravo- I completely agree that we all need to do whatever it takes to keep this healthcare bill from passing. We may not have the best healthcare system (really, it's such a game), but I believe that people should have the right to choose the doctors they see and the treatments they receive. It's appalling to me to even think for one minute that the government should tax (some of) us even more to get our care on THEIR timetable.

Notice how the price of medical procedures like (elective) eye surgery, and (elective) plastic surgery has decreased in recent years. That's because people shop around for the best deal (since the insurance probably isn't paying), forcing the providers to be competitive in the market.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Carrie 2009-08-02 01:27
The whole thing angers me to no end. I know we need change, and I know we have it good comparatively - but suggesting MORE government just seems...redundant.

Sigh.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Al_Pal 2009-08-02 01:45
I had seriously thought that I wanted some govt-option healthcare.
As someone who works freelance, on contract, my current health care plan is, "be careful; don't get sick". I know a *lot* of people like me, especially artists, musicians; people spending a huge portion of their income on housing to live in the beautiful SF Bay area. (To me, it is totally worth it)

I know a lot of people who are 'un-insurable'.

so, yeah. I had really high hopes for the health care plan.

All those regulations, though? APPALL the Libertarian part of me! :P
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Sarah 2009-08-02 04:29
I grew up in New Zealand, lived in Boston MA for 5 years, and have now emigrated to Australia. From my perspective the socialised health care system in Australia is 100% better than the care we had in the US, but the US heath care system is 100% better than the run down socialised health care system in NZ. What's my point? Not all socialised health care is bad, it depends on how well it is funded. I *do* believe, very strongly, that everyone is entitled to basic health care. Aside from quality of life for the individual, it is in the nation's interest for everyone to be able to see a doctor when they need to.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Chiloe 2009-08-02 05:05
You critized the french system (we have public and private hospitals and it costs the same to us) but here you will never see a family posting a link to their website to raise money for their kid who has cancer in order to pay for his treatment. The cancer chemio treatment is 100% paid by the goverment. And Pierre, my oldest, DID get his treatment and no he didn't have to wait. And yes he is STILL alive from his goverment paid treatment ( actually his medical needs are 100% covered for 10 years after the begining of his illness). The goverment is even helping the parent who has to take a leave from their job during the illness (so they can take caree of their child without worrying about money loss). And Pierre can also get his speech therapist for free! My kids glasses are also 100% free.

Here EVERYBODY gets GOOD dental care. Not like my in-laws: first generation immigrant in Texas who CANNOT afford a dental insurance and prefer to have the tooth remove. Isn't it sad? :sad:
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Chiloe 2009-08-02 05:07
Here I can go to the doctor and pay only 22 euros for a visit. In Texas, no health insurance, I paid $122 for a strep infection. I was afraid of getting sick ALL the time ... When my nephew got a stomach bug, he had to go to the hospital to get fluid for a night and they had to pay $800: for a night. Here, he would have gotten the same treatment for FREE ! My in-laws are hard working people but as first time immigrant, they don't get a lot of money in spite of their long hours of work. Oh and the medecines prices are also regulated so everybody can afford them !
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# steve 2010-01-02 19:04
nothin's free, nuthun! you really believe the govt. can run anything effeciently?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Chiloe 2009-08-02 05:09
You are the wife of a dentist which means he DOES get good money and can afford to pay to get a good insurance for the five of you. But what about the people who are not as smart as him, who couldn't afford medical school? Yes, because here, university is FREE and everybody can become a doctor if they can study.It's true here doctors are not as rich as american doctors but trust me, they are living very very well and are not poor. I know both system. I delivered my 1st child in a US public hospital: my epidural went off DURING my C section and Pierre ended up in NICU dying. I deliverd my 2 nd child in a private US hospital and my 3 rd in a french hospital. I can tell you there are bad and good hospitals everywhere in the world (no system is perfect) but what I know is EVERY human being SHOULD have access to a good and affordable health care because our health is our most precious asset in our life. And the peace of mind to have not to worry about health care is priceless !!! Really ! ;-)
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Chiloe 2009-08-02 05:09
Sorry I had to write this comment in 3 times: it was too long ...
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Kat 2009-08-02 06:44
AMEN!!!!!!
I have heard so many horror stories (like children's eardrums bursting while they wait for medicine for an ear infection). They just go on and on. And if anyone thinks that won't happen to our health care system because we are "Americans" they'd better think again. Just look at the simple Cash for Clunkers program. An easy program compared to a huge giant such as health care and it is already under. Good grief.
Yes, affordable health care is a MUST. But not this way.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# The Diaper Diaries 2009-08-02 07:05
I don't have anything eloquent to say except AMEN!! And isn't it interesting that the same idiots who will pass this bill won't have to be in this system. How very Washington of them. Maybe instead of doctors we should encourage our kids to be politicians?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# JMH 2009-08-02 07:11
Good post and I agree with you. Yes, our health care system needs changed, however, I disagree with the current bill in Congress. I really do not like how our rights to choose are slowly being taken away from us.

Serious question for Chiloe and others from Canada, New Zealand, etc: Do your govt. officials participate in the govt. run health care system? One of the points of this bill that really upsets me is that Congress and their families are exempt from the govt. run health care. Why?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Karin Katherine 2009-08-02 07:14
It really amazes me that we have so many immigrants to the USA yet the USA seems to think we need to be like the other countries who have people leaving in droves to come here.
Amazing.

I am against Socialism. Pure and simple.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Avitable 2009-08-02 07:59
Most of those interpretations on Jill's blog are dead wrong, especially the one about being "more important than the Constitution" or physicians all getting paid the same. So keep that in mind.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# aussiechic 2009-08-02 08:09
Oh I TOTALLY agree with you - Govt run health care is NOT the answer for the US. It does not matter if it works in other countries or not - that is the point - what works for one country does not necessarily work for another. This is a very scary issue and something that the general public needs to understand properly before anything gets passed. People must read this bill.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# steve 2010-01-02 19:07
how can you read it when harry reid won't let it out to be read. red flag.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Casey 2009-08-02 08:11
I couldn't agree more! I currently live in Germany and must visit the socialized medical system from time to time when I need to get sick days approved for work. That's right- you can't just call out sick when the government is involved. You have to wait days for a simple appointment (pink eye for me) and then 3 more days for the pharmacy to order your meds. When competition for customers/patients goes down, so does care. Why do people send their sick here for the latest treatments? I'd rather pay more for better care.

Oh, and what Chloe fails to mention is what that 22 euro doctor visit takes out of her paycheck each month. 40 PERCENT of my pay checks goes for social porgrams (including medical), 40 PERCENT!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Casey 2009-08-02 08:12
And by "here" I mean the US, which will always be home to me!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Secret Mom Thoughts 2009-08-02 08:22
I have family in England. Healthcare for everyone sounds great till you need an operation and have to wait months. My grandfather died waiting for a brain surgery. I will always wonder if it would have been different if he lived here. The plan for US healthcare scares me.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# kakaty 2009-08-02 08:50
First of all I applaud you for putting this out there. However, you are seriously flawed in saying "President Obama is taking health care" anywhere. One of the basic tenets of our gov't is that the president does not create law - he can set the tone and push congress to pay attention to a particular area, and he can even set guidelines. But CONGRESS writes the law, so if you are not happy with the law be unhappy with congress and act accordingly. And I do sincerely hope that you actually read the bill and not just Jill's select bits and comments....
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# kakaty 2009-08-02 08:51
...Secondly - I don't think your experience in Paris is any different then the average ER visit in the US. Last year when I was in an suburban, affluent hospital I waited nearly 6 hours to be seen. So 4 hours isn't so bad. And of all my Canadian friends, previous US citizens/residents included - not ONE would give up their system for ours.

And finally I just want to point out that the average annual premium for employer-based healthcare right now is $12,700 and the gross earnings for a full-time, minimum-wage worker is $10,712....you do the math. And I sure hope you are saving because according to most you will need between $300 & $500k when you retire just to pay for your healthcare. This bill may not be the best but it's a start.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# steve 2010-01-02 19:10
this bill won't reduce wait times only your taxes or early death because you don't reeally need that ,it's too expensive.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Nicole 2009-08-02 09:00
Thank you for writing this. I am not AT ALL politically inclined, and have been turning a blind eye to any talk related to Obama's healthcare plan, telling myself I was too busy to really sit and listen to all of the news coverage. You have inspired me to do more reading and research and to make sure I too have the best interests of my children and their children at heart.

(And WOW! Those are really some of the terms of the bill?! I am officially scared for the fate of our nation!)
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Lisa 2009-08-02 09:02
Oh man...that is one sweet letter. What a lucky boy he is to have you as his mama. As I read it, now a mother of three, I completely know what you mean. My sweet first-born will trek off to kindergarten in 8 short days. And just typing that makes my eyes spring full of tears. Oh.....for the love of a firstborn!
Happy Birthday to Jay!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Maria 2009-08-02 09:07
I read Jill's post, and shared it in my reader because I thought it was an interesting post and some people might want to see it.

BUT her interpretation on some of it is wrong, as is yours. I have issues with some things in the bill, but I'd rather see it in place than not.

Anyway, I think you should check out Erin's post, she has the ability to help your voice be heard, and some of the comments are really enlightening.

queenofspainblog.com/.../#comments
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Lisa 2009-08-02 09:08
This is a tricky, tricky one. Reading this has made me want to go and learn more about the specifics of the bill. BUT....as someone with MS, I will NEVER be able to get private insurance if we ever had a lapse in coverage. Once I'm on medicine the cost of my medicine alone without insurance could reach $30,000. I have to be ultra careful when I enter back into the work force to not let my medical situation leak, as it may prevent me from getting hired. My husband and I may not get to live the retired life we have always hoped, dreamed and saved for because private insurance will not be an option. SO....for people like me, being guarateed healthcare sounds pretty good. I didn't choose to have MS, and I didn't choose the become uninsurable.
Okay....off to learn more. Thanks for the encouragement!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# EveGrey 2009-08-02 09:15
Ugh, I'm from Canada & I could NOT disagree with you more. My husband is a medical physicist with the cancer care hospital & patients wait 7 days from diagnosis to treatment. I agree our system could improve but I still think it is MILES better than that of the U.S. system which is great if you have benefits. I am the first one to point out erroprs in any system & they DO exist but our healthcare is fair and decent. I have 3 children & I've never had to wait an unnacceptable time for anything. Just look at average life expectancy in the U.S compared to Canada for evidence of the effectiveness of the two systems.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# EveGrey 2009-08-02 09:16
You can definitely find people who live in Canada who are not happy with our system but if you are not hearing the horror stories about people with no coverage in the U.S or people denied coverage in the U.S after paying into plans for years due to "pre-existing" conditions like high blood pressure, than you're not talking to the right people. You are a good woman but I am going to assume, perhaps wrongly, that everyone you know is comofortable financially & has insuranceSorry, had to split into two)
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# steve 2010-01-02 19:17
people every where are unhappy with their hospital, wait times etc. but what she says is true, the sad thing is the more we complain the less they listen and rush the bill even faster. the elite of washington will do what they want, not what those who they represent want done.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Jill 2009-08-02 09:37
Okay. Here's my 2 cents, for what it's worth.

This bill is over 1000 pages long and I'm a mom with a job and an intensive summer course in contract law. I haven't had time to read it verbatim, on my own, like I usually would.

But some people are freaking out over summaries that were, in essence, exaggerated at best. Please, take a breath.

There are likely plenty of points in this bill I won't agree with. But I want to cover some of your concerns right here and now. (And kudos to you for having the courage to say something.)
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Jill 2009-08-02 09:37
RE: pg 53- Yes, legal speak is entirely mind boggling. What that really says (I think) is more like the saying constitutionally this bill doesn't take precedence where it would otherwise be unconstitutional. (An example would be if your religion prohibited it, you can opt out. That is if I got that all right. But I'm new... hang in there with me here.)

Pg: 42: Okay, really- your health insurance provider as well as the employer who belongs to the plan do that for you already. Every day. It's absolutely the same only the gov't isn't looking to make a profit.

The government, like it or not, already has access to your financial status. You file taxes every year? You deduct your expenses: mortgage, health care, day care- whatever it may be, you nickel and dime the government (just like it does you.)
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Jill 2009-08-02 09:37
Pg 124- This is so that no one can call the Gov't plan a monopoly and sue that they have too much business. Insurance companies will never sue because their competitor (govt) is charging too MUCH. Only that their option is cheaper.

On the issue of pay. Well, I'm going out on a limb here, but I'm going to guess Mr. OhMommy gets a set rate for procedures done for insurance patients. It's the same thing here. The gov't health insurance will pay X amount for this procedure. ALL insurance companies do this. ALL OF THEM. If you are insured, or a Doctor who accepts health insurance, you have a set agreement. Period.

As far as end of life, there are tons of pages, but I'll read decipher and offer an unbiased opinion on which, if you'd like.

I'm going to go read and translate. (This could take a while) And then probably do a post of my own, because Holy Crow I just had the longest comment I've ever left. Ever.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Jill 2009-08-02 09:41
Wishing your sweet boy many happy birthday wishes. You're both very lucky to have each other!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Christina 2009-08-02 10:02
I don't think long waits are limited to outside of the US. My daughter was on a waiting list for over a year to get evaluated for autism - a year without any action, when early intervention is critical! We finally sought out a private source to get an evaluation.

Same daughter broke her tooth in half two months ago. I took her to Nationwide Children's Hospital - the best in the area and well-regarded nationally - to be told that dental surgery to fix it would take 8-10 weeks to schedule. I had to throw a fit, pointing out she was in pain, to get "upgraded" to a 2-3 week wait. I was told, "Kids can get used to that kind of chronic pain."

I have yet to ever get in to see my doctor same day. Trying to see a dermatologist about a possible skin cancer? 2 month wait.

I had (and now have again) good health insurance, and I don't live in a rural area - I'm in Columbus, OH. I may not agree with everything in the health care bill, but an attempt at change is far better than the status quo, in my opinion.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Christina 2009-08-02 10:04
Also I wanted to add, as a nurse, I also think it's time for a nationalized medical records system, too. To provide the best care, we need easy access to complete medical records for a patient. It's crazy when you're trying to pull together a jumble of records from different doctors/hospitals/states for a patient. Miss one record and you could miss a critical piece of information.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# TRACI 2009-08-02 10:19
My hubs has been an exec for retail companies since beginning his career, his health care options are the same as those who check you out and stock the clothes. All retail is the same way, the companies can't afford to offer better care and coverage to the college grads as they do to the 17 year old stock boy supporting a new baby. We have paid an exorbitant amount in the upwards of 700 a month. Yeah, our options f*cking rock. I can get coverage, anywhere, anytime no questions asked. No prenotification, not so much as a blink. But what about the old lady ringing me out at the cosmetic counter? Can she afford the ridiculous premiums? No doubt, my kids and myself are fortunate in what we can get done health wise. And no doubt is this a flawed system.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Tootsie Farklepants 2009-08-02 10:30
We have excellent insurance through my husband's employer and I've never left an ER in under 5 hours in the US.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Lynn @ human, being 2009-08-02 10:33
the healthcare rationing of which you speak ALREADY HAPPENS in America. It happens for those people who do not have health insurance at all. Uninsured people do not get cancer care until it's too late to cure it, and when they do get care, they are offered less than state-of-the-art care (there are dozens of studies on these so-called health disparties). Uninsured people do not get stitches. They use band-aids and hope the scar won't be too bad. When my brother was uninsured, he fell and hit shattered his jaw. He went to our local safety net hospital and he waited for nearly 18 hours in excruciating pain before he was seen, watching other people with health insurance and lesser medical needs be cared for before him.

Private health insurance companies are too entrenched to go away. While the current plan under consideration is flawed, it's better than what uninsured and underinsured people in this country have.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Someone Being Me 2009-08-02 10:34
Amen. The government has not proven to me that they can effectively manage the programs they already have (Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, etc) without taking tremendous losses and without fraud. Why should we give them even more responsibility?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Susan 2009-08-02 10:46
Bravo OHMommy! I think we can all agree that the current US system of healthcare could use reform, but government run/managed health care, especially what they are proposing, is not the answer. When has our government successfully taken over any program and actually made it work for the masses and remain well funded? I certainly am NOT a proponent of any plan that allows the government access to my personal, financial and medical records. That is not the role of government and I think many people are foolish in thinking that more government will be better. Our country was created with freedoms and rights for the people and has been successful in that format for many, many years. Why suddenly do so many want the government to essentially be able to remove many of those blessed freedoms?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Susan 2009-08-02 10:47
Thank you for putting this information out there. I hope if nothing else it will prompt many Americans to get more informed about what all of this will mean. Passing the bill and moving on from there will not work. The bill needs to be right from the beginning. Why is there such a rush by our president and congress to get it passed? Maybe it is because they don't want people, including many members of Congress who won't even take the time to read the bill, to be truly aware of what it says. That certainly got us into trouble with all of the supposed "stimulus" money that went to fund stupid things that certainly won't make our economy or citizens better off.
Oh and by the way, the Cars for Clunkers program which was funded for a whole 4 days before it was canceled due to lack of funding, gave the government the right to essentially "own" your computer and all the data, photos, content, etc when you agreed to the terms on the cars.gov website. Nice!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# JoMamma02 2009-08-02 11:16
THIS Polish-Immigrant is so PROUD of you for speaking your mind, even though we DO read blogs on the weekends....haha!
You will always encounter those who disagree. But you know what? THAT is the beauty of living in a free land. You just excercised Free Speech. Something our parents did not have when they left Poland. So that my lovely friend, made it worth it right there.

Buzki1
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Chelsie 2009-08-02 11:25
I completely agree. I do not want the governtment running our healthcare. I have friends from canada who moved here because they needed better healthcare, I do nont like this at all.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Jill 2009-08-02 11:38
Thanks for writing this. If nothing else, it got people thinking and hopefully READING the bill.

For me, the most telling part is that members of the government will not be participating in this plan. Why not?

As I've said before, we need to do something to help those who desperately need healthcare and are unable to afford it. Unfortunately this plan is not the answer.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# debi9kids 2009-08-02 11:58
HOLY CRAP! I have never read your blog before, but saw your link on my SIL's blog and the title caught my eye...

I am a conservative and very informed, yet didn't know all of the details you just published. From what I had know, I was worried, but now, HOLY!, I am outraged. Not calling a tax a tax? Why, so people won't get angry?
Knowing our finances? I think not!
This is awful and I really worry about where our country is going!
Great & informed post!
Hope you don't mind, but I am going to "put you out there"...
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# The Clark Family 2009-08-02 12:01
Amen, sister. I am so glad you had the gall to write this (and that I read blogs on the weekend). I stand behind you 100%, and am forever a fan for this one post.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# MissM 2009-08-02 12:28
Honestly, I am too sleep deprived to comprehend the details right now, but... to make a point...

During my last pregnancy, I was at the hospital twice. Never admitted. I received 6 doses of medication, and was hooked up to a monitor for 12 hours total. Any guesses on the cost? Any? FOURTEEN THOUSAND DOLLARS! Yes, $14,000.Not a mistake. For monitoring and medication. I never even encountered a physician. I only saw nurses the entire time.

So while this congressional bill may not be THE bill, there certainly needs to be some change.

One more time for good measure... $14,000.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# ShredderFeeder 2009-08-02 12:31
My response was a little too long-winded for your comments field, so I posted it and linked back.

www.shredderfood.com/?p=690

With all due respect, you are dead-wrong on healthcare. Any healthcare system that by it's very nature discriminates against a group of people, in this case the poor, is wrong to it's very core.

It's easy for you to rail against government system, you have a good life, a well-employed husband, and your kids never want for anything.

30 days of worrying whether a fall resulting in a broken arm or a bout of the flu will either kill your child push you into homelessness will change your mind in a cocaine heartbeat.

The health insurance had their chance to get it right and they screwed us to the wall. Government run care might not be good, but it can't suck as bad as the current system does.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# ShredderFeeder 2009-08-02 12:59
And in France - you saw a doctor. Whether it was 4 hours or 14 later, you saw a doctor.

Millions of children here don't have that option. Or that option is tempered by the knowledge that a visit to the Emergency Room will bankrupt the parents.

Would you be able to make the choice to take your child to the emergency room knowing that financial devistation and homelessness is a likely result of that trip? Or would you, like most, hesitate...

While I don't believe the current system should be replaced, I think that everyone should have the right to opt-in to a federal program. This would force the health-insurance companies to be more competitive, thus bringing private health-coverage within reach of more people, mitigating the need for public health-care etc.

Think about it before you doom my child to a life without health coverage.

And if you're going to, come and tell him to his face that he doesn't deserve health care because you don't want your taxes to go up.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Caffeine Free Mama 2009-08-02 13:10
Well, done! I sent your post to everyone I know. And who says no one reads blogs on the weekend. :-)
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Cheri 2009-08-02 13:43
I could not agree with you more!! It really is sickening to think this is where our country might be going.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Casey 2009-08-02 13:50
Not that my opinion matters a bunch, but I do work in healthcare and could not agree with you more.

You are so right about this being a REALLY bad idea.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# christine 2009-08-02 14:34
I had a comment all written out, but it was too long. Sigh.

I'll just say that I have read as much of this bill as I've been able, and it's patently untrue that people won't be forced into the public "option." My family is one of those families. We purchase our insurance individually, not through an employer. The ability to be able to do that per this bill will be phased out and those will be forced into gov't plan.

Why does Obama keep claiming otherwise? Perhaps, like John Conyers, he hasn't read bill because it's too long and confusing. And it doesn't apply to them or their families.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Irene 2009-08-02 14:39
Good for you!!!!! I completely agree! I absolutely cringe at anything that involves MORE government intervention. Socialism scares the crap out of me.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Mr Lady 2009-08-02 15:14
One other thing: The gov't already has access to your everything. It's called the Patriot Act. I still love you, though. :-)
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# MIT Mommy 2009-08-02 15:23
Although I generally wouldn't link my blog post in a comment, I have to reference what I posted on Oct 17th, 2008. If you only have a moment, please scroll down and read the comment from a Democrat mom blogger who generally disagrees with me, which is even more fun. Rereading it now, it struck me that she specifically states that Obama promised everyone that they could keep their current healthcare and that he was just planning on adding a safety net.
mitmommy.blogspot.com/.../...

I suppose what he meant was that you could keep your current healthcare plan, until the govt could phase it out within a short time.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Stephanie 2009-08-02 16:03
Well, all I can say is I totally agree with you. People who agree with the healthcare plan need to go live in Canada and see how they like it before making a judgement. I'm really angry with Obama for getting in and screwing so many things up. No doubt, someone will disagree with me, and that's what make the world go 'round. We're all entitled to our opinions. It just angers me that people who work hard for what they have have to suffer because other people want to live off everyone else for free. It encourages EVERYONE to be a slacker. Not smart enough to be a doctor? BLAH! Study harder. There's a reason the old adage "Where there's a will there's a way" is so famous!

Well put OhMommy! I applaud you!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Lisa@verybusymomwith4 2009-08-02 16:12
LOL One only need look at my tweets (lisaindallas) to know where I stand here ;-)
The think I have the biggest problem with is the senior care. Knowing I will one day be old, this terrifies me!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Nan Patience 2009-08-02 16:49
I share your concern about health care, I really do. All I want is affordable, quality health care. All I know is that currently the USA is rated 37th in the world in terms of quality health care, and I know that Wall Street has had a greater say than Main Street in the affairs of our nation. Too many are being cut out. It's immoral, the way insurance companies treat people, and they're not in the morality or care business, they're in the business of making money. Period. I want mainstream, quality, affordable health care based on health and care, and I want all parties to be rewarded for good outcomes, which are things that have been missing from our system for some time.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# tracey 2009-08-02 17:47
Wow. I hadn't read about all of those FABULOUS perks. Like access to my accounts. That is... unbelievable...

I'm sorry. I'm stuck on that one point. Basically, if I owe, say $7,000 for my son's weird stomach pains from last year, which the doctor recommended a ct scan for, even though he only had severe constipation, and our insurance crapped out on us, so I am being pestered by creditors... the govt could just deduct the money from our checking account. Instead of paying for our mortgage, the hospital would be paid for an unnecessary procedure that we couldn't afford.

Theoretically, of course. Not that I personally owe over $7,000 for Evan's severe stomach pains at 1 am...

Awesome.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# lisa 2009-08-02 18:14
I appauld you for taking a stand & bringing more attention to the healthcare issue and I agree the current proposed legislation is not the answer to our problems. Do we we need to fix aspects of healthcare...yes, do we need insurance reform...completely but the government taking it into their hands is not the fix. If they don't have time to even read the bill, what makes anyone think they will have the time to take care of us in illness?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Emily 2009-08-02 18:22
Only 3 weeks to go and #1 and #2 will be on the bus! #3 will definitely be sad to be home with just me! Great giveaway!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Krystyn 2009-08-02 18:40
Ha...no one reads blogs on the weekend.

I am outraged and disgusted. This "bill" is a joke!

My hubby's uncle needed quadruple bypass surgery in England and he was on a waiting list for months.

The worst part? It's totally a slippery slope.

Gov't says you can't have a procedure, next thing we know, they are telling us we can't have a child because they are sick!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Jessica 2009-08-02 18:48
I haven't been in bloggy land for a little while, so I'm almost scared to say that I LOVE YOUR NEW LOOK! (I don't know how long it's been here though, or how new it is for that matter.) :-)

Oh, and about the post, I'm on your side. I totally agree with where you're coming from!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Christine 2009-08-02 18:59
It's a fallacy that the US healthcare system discriminates against "poor." Medicaid covers them.

The 47 million or so uninsured in this country break down like this: 1/3 are eligible for Medicaid but haven't signed up, 30% make more than 50K and declined employer offered h/c benefits, 20% of the 47 million are not US citizens.

That leaves about 11 million chronically uninsured in this country (uninsured for more than one year). Most are middle class that make too much for Medicaid but live in a state where health insurance is costly. Many have pre-existing conditions that further drive up healthcare.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Christine 2009-08-02 19:06
By opening up STATE borders and allowing health care consumers to select plans from companies in another state would greatly increase competition thus reducing the cost of purchasing insurance. Also removing insurance companies' ability to deny coverage due to (or charge more for) pre-existing conditions would allow many presently unable to purchase insurance to afford it.

Adding a public "option" that would standardize all policies to mirror theirs (that is in bill; I've read it myself ) while charging 20% less also by default leads to the removal of private options from table.

Most of us won't be able to keep our present insurance plans within a few years of this bill being passed. No matter what they tell you. Remember, they haven't READ IT.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Texan Mama 2009-08-02 19:32
Hey,
Bravo for having the guts to voice a real concern about a touchy and controversial subject. You go girl!

As this mama who was NOT for Obama, I am wondering what everyone was thinking he meant when he told us during the elections that we needed to reform healthcare. Couldn't we see this coming?

My guess is that Pres. Obama will not get this bill passed nor will he try very hard. He'll get popularity points for "trying" and then he actually won't want it pushed through Congress, because he knows it will be unpopular with the American People and he'll never get elected to a second term of office.

That's just my opinion. But I'm not voting for him next time either anyway.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Maggie 2009-08-02 20:47
In our not so fabulous current health system where you can supposedly get treatment immediately, I had to wait so long in our top tier hospital's e.r. that my appendix burst shortly before surgery. Why was the e.r. so backed up? Because poor people have no choice but to use it as their primary care doctor. We need change. Our health care system doesn't take care of everyone adequately. And, as one commenter pointed out, you don't see people in so called *socialized* medicine countries going on the internet fundraising for their medical treatment.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Marinka 2009-08-02 20:50
I love you all political. If it helps, my parents totally agree with you. And my inlaws are convinced that Obama's not a citizen.

Personally, I think it's a travesty that so many Americans don't have health insurance. And I'm embarrassed to admit that I don't know enough about the new plan to have an intelligent discussion about it. I just know that if my parents hate it, it's got to be awesome.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Julie B. 2009-08-02 20:56
Crap...my whole comment just got deleted...well the shortened version is that I'm still pretty sure that this plan does not replace the system we already have - it will just be an additional plan available to whooever wants it. The drawback is that it is going to overload the system with many more people seeking health care who may not have before. But all the language about doctors being paid the same, etc - is likely relating to for services performed for a plan participant. I can't imagine that the govt is going to seek to take over for all insurance companies after so many bailouts to protect jobs, etc. The insurance industry is a major part of our economy. Of course, I'm ignorant and haven't actually read the bill - but I am very leary of basing my understanding of the bill off of a few quotes. I think it's great that you brought up this topic though. Hopefully everyone will do a little more research now to find out more about the bill. I know I plan to.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Leslie 2009-08-02 21:33
Wow....is it hot in here, or is it just me???

I think political posts are sexy....just sayin'

What? Did you really think I would give a mature/educated comment??? Pfft, you know me better than that! Someone had to lighten the mood in here ;-)
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Julie B. 2009-08-02 21:35
Oh for the love of God - I just went through and read all the comments and noticed my SIL chimed in as the one who noticed your title on my blog list. This is what I was worried about...those who read a few qoutes that are interpretations (maybe or maybe not correct), but now bible truth because it's "out there", I sure hope snopes.com will address the language in this bill soon so I can send it to her. And also, we should all realize that this "bill" is not in a final format yet. Obviously, the general topic is scary enough to many - but also keep in mind that stuff is being added and taken out and edited on a daily basis.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Preppy 101 2009-08-02 21:52
Thank you for this intelligent, knowledgeable post! I agree 100%. We better be contacting our representatives on this one for sure! Obama just demeans anyone in his angry, condescending voice when asked a question. I call it his bullying strategy to keep people from asking him questions or making questioning comments about anything he says or does!

Thanks for this post!!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Karen 2009-08-02 22:05
As the mother of a child with a disability, this scares the crap out of me. What kind of care will our son be given under the new plan? Will he still be able to receive therapy? I try not to panic, but some days it's harder than others.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# amy2boys 2009-08-02 22:30
THIS ROCKS. My FIL did graduate from Harvard Medical School. But, it certainly isn't shaping up to be the career we'd advise his grandsons, my sons, to pursue.

They would be government employees with wage caps in a bureaucratic system of red tape with a frustrating lack of decision-making power on behalf of their own patients.

We should all be completely terrified. Anyone who isn't doesn't get it.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Cara 2009-08-02 22:40
Well said. This bill scares me. The numbers of uninsured are grossly exaggerated. The costs are grossly underreported. This thing will be devastating. Pray that Obama and his henchmen in congress don't make it happen.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Ashley Sanders 2009-08-02 23:11
Okay. I'm glad I read through the comments...only because I'm needing SOME HOPE here that Obama isn't screwing everything up. I've heard so MANY bad things lately, I just need to hear some half decent stuff that makes me feel like he isn't going to send our country straight to hell in a handbasket.

I'm glad you wrote what you wrote. Maybe if you find out different, you can post that too? OY!

Hugs
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Julie 2009-08-02 23:20
What is the difference between the government telling you what doctor you can see and the insurance company telling you what doctor you can see? That is if you can afford health insurance. If you can't then you get whatever doctor is in the emergency room. So, then it is left up to fate. nice.

What is the difference between the government telling you what procedure you can get, what medicine it is willing to pay for, and when you are going to get it OR the insurance company telling you? Again, if you don't have health insurance...
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Julie 2009-08-02 23:22
Do you know what it is like to avoid taking yourself or your child to the doctor because you can't afford it (even with health insurance) or because you can't afford to take off any time from work?

Do you understand that if we practiced more preventative medicine (i.e., go to the doctor when you are sick instead of waiting) that our entire society would reap the benefits in many many ways.

HOW is it any better than the way it is? (My child has had to suffer an ear infection all weekend because I cannot afford to take her to the ER.) The US may have the "best health care treatments in the world", yet why is it that we rank 18th in health care service in the world according to the WHO?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Julie 2009-08-02 23:26
BTW, I would hope that your son would go to Harvard Medical School and become a medical doctor because he genuinely wants to help people and make the world a better place, not because he wants a big fat paycheck.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Natalie 2009-08-02 23:45
Sarah makes the point I would have tried to make. And my son's grandfather is alive because of the Canadian health care system for treatment he couldn't have afforded in the US. I do believe that this is the wrong tree right now, but it is important. I think Obama tosses out huge ideas because he knows he's only going to get a smidgen of that. You know how these things go, the president throws out an idea and by the time it is written into law, it is only 10 percent of what it was, IF it happens at all.

What makes me really angry is the fact that we sure as hell could throw money away for a war, but we can't afford to pay for the health of our people? Talk about screwed up priorities.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Jill 2009-08-02 23:57
I think we should take this to the Oprah show. This is good stuff! All the commenters can sit in the studio audience, and hopefully at the end of the debate we can all take home some sweet swag courtesy of Harpo Productions!

Afterall, from what I hear, no blogger worth her salt can resist SWAG.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Tiaras & Tantrums 2009-08-03 01:09
(LOVE all the comments!!!!!!)

hey - why did you change the ending?

*MrLady - I can introduce you to all the Canadians that I know that are unhappy with their hc!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# texasholly 2009-08-03 08:55
AMEN. I have been doing some waiting time research on the Canada system - they have this nifty website where you can go type in your ailment and where you live and they will give you the average REPORTED wait times. FUN! Brain tumor - 9 mos. MRI to diagnose that brain tumor - 6 mos. REWIND - you are 15 months out with a brain tumor which is super lucky for Canada because you are probably dead by that time which saves them a bunch of money.

Quite honestly I am so ill over all this I can't even type straight.

GREAT POST - I have tried to stumble it about 10 times and it won't stick - conspiracy or am I just an idiot?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Alli Worthington 2009-08-03 09:20
I am your fangirl now.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Tiffany 2009-08-03 09:37
I completely agree with you and I think it's great you posted this. People need to know this is a BAD idea!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Brittany 2009-08-03 09:49
Oh girly, I adore you for writing this!

I disagree with you on most/all points, but I still love that you put the conversation out there to have.

Oh, and Tiaras...I bet I can introduce you to MORE Americans unhappy with THEIR hc:-)
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Em 2009-08-03 10:03
First of all - I love the political angle. Too many people are too scared to go there because too many people make it personal and nasty. Good for you.

And VERY glad to see comments are debating - not tossing insults.

Second - I do agree that something needs to be done about the cost of healthcare, and the randomness of it all. My hub's company is "self-funded" meaning it does not have to go by state mandates, therefore we have to fight for my youngest son's PKU formula coverage. Even though the company would pay for institutionalizing him when he became retarded without the formula. Just exhibit A. However - the government needs to figure out Medicaid/Medicare/SS first. The Baby Boomers are coming - let the healthcare worries really begin.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# lceel 2009-08-03 10:15
Being a person who will not, normally, discuss Religion or Politics (Old rule from my drinkin' days - social drinkin' - not SERIOUS drinkin' - because I never seriously drank - I don't drink now (well, just a little) because I don't want to miss anything - it's too much fun staying sober) I cannot comment on the things you point out until I can read the bill, in its entirety, so that those tidbits are presented in proper context. That said, some of those things would appear to require an awful lot of context. I'm just sayin'.

I'm looking at the letters I have to type in - and didn't I just get through saying I don't drink (much) anymore? The letters are MGDNO - MGD NO. How cool is that?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Renny 2009-08-03 10:41
I love this. Thank you! You're right, there are some serious problems in our healthcare system that definitely need to be taken care of, and several other people have raised a lot of those points in their comments, but government run healthcare system IS NOT the answer.
Tell me, how are taxes supposed to remain low on this system? Healthcare is NEVER free folks, and anyone who thinks it is is kidding themselves. Most countries with socialized medicine pay taxes through the nose.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# samantha 2009-08-03 12:04
Thank you for posting this. Hopefully if enough people are as enraged as you, as me... something will be done to stop this maddness... Who's best interests are being taken into account? Not mine or my childrens... It is a very scary time...
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# MommyTime 2009-08-03 12:09
I have to respectfully disagree with you, but all the reasons why are too long to put into a comment -- which is why I had to write my own post about it for today. Thanks for igniting a great discussion!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Elisa 2009-08-03 12:34
I really don't think that's where the US should be heading. Because knowing how things are done and the power Big Pharma has there, they will not do right by the average US citizen (or resident). I don't know if the "translation" of the bill is correct, but if it is, it is shameful.

I don't think there is anything inherently wrong with government-founded health care, but I know it won't work well in the US.

Italy has government-funded health care too, and it's not always good, but it's nowhere new when US health care is. Thing is, other things will always have priority there. Gah, don't get me started. I love the US but some things I find very scary.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Jo 2009-08-03 12:37
Lots of naive people in these comments who think Obama is not trying to hide what he's doing. Here's what he actually wants to do...in his own words. Watch the video. I can't believe people really trust this guy.

ace.mu.nu/archives/290455.php
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Jo 2009-08-03 12:46
John Stossell did an excellent report on this a few nights ago on 20/20. Reported what it is like in Canada and England. It should be required watching, so those who think those systems are great can get their facts straight. Like one expert in healthcare said the other night...Obama will implement his system slowly so the public doesn't realize what is happening till it's too late. These libs are smart -- smart in a cunning way. Not what you want in a leader.

I love the sign I saw at one of the rallies. If our healthcare becomes socialized, where will Canadians go to get healthcare?" ha ha ha...
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# idalka blaszczyk 2009-08-03 12:50
Paulinka, jestes fenomenalna matka. Wszystkiego dobrego na siodme urodziny Twojego synka. Pierwszy, rzeczywiscie - kroliczej doswiadczalny mamy, wierz, ze nie zrobilas mu nic zlego, przeciez go kochasz. I to jak? Madrze. Sciskam Cie piekna Mamo, cudowny Twoj blog, ale jeszcze lepsza Ty - jako Mama. calusy Idalka z Chicago
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Ashley 2009-08-03 13:04
As a mother of three and as a wife of a physician I completely agree with your blog post. My husband and I have discussed this subject with our friends MD's and not and nobody likes it.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Alicia 2009-08-03 14:51
Could not agree with you more! Great post!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Mike K 2009-08-03 15:26
It's OhMama vs Obama =) Gotta love it

I'm self-employed, so I have to pay my healthcare bills out of pocket. I'm still trying to pay off a simple operation I had last year, so people would normally think I would be for free health care but...

Have you ever been to the US postal office, federal office, or any other gov't run agency? It is absolutely a horrible experience. We ARE NOT Canada or England. Their gov't run agencies are far more efficient, and yet they still have months of waiting times. It can only turn out worse in the USA.

I'm. Scared.

The same arguments used in trying to pass this bill (millions of uninsured Americans) can be used to support other socialist ideas (free housing, food, and clothing). If you can afford a better home, meal, or clothing...why would you make them use the same as everyone else? (What would be the advantage to making more money? AKA trying harder??) I really don't wanna live in a studio apartment, eating McD's, and wearing a MuuMuu in the future.

Help us OhMama!!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# OHmommy 2009-08-03 15:53
What Im having trouble with is that Obama does plan on phasing out private insurance completely in his words "in a decade or so" which doesn't allow for choice. Everyone will have the same insurance.

Just like everyone goes to the same type of government run post office and/or other govt run establishments. And we know how those are run. That's my point.

And it's unfair that the people planning on phasing out our choices have a completely separate health care plan.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Jill 2009-08-03 16:01
Pauline-

Great point.

I wholeheartedly feel that we should have a quality government health program available to the uninsured.

What I object to, is the government taking away our choices. Freedom of choice is one of the things that makes America special.

I hope the government can find a way to put together a top notch system to help those who do not have insurance without requiring that the entire country (except of course, for the President and Congress) participate in it.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# steve 2010-01-02 19:22
I DON'T. i don't want the govt meddling in my health, period.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Burgh Baby 2009-08-03 16:22
This much I know: My mother died of breast cancer because we did not have the means to pay for insurance or any health care. While she was never denied service because we couldn't pay the bills, she was never given the opportunities she needed to receive preventative care. Something has to be done before another woman finds a small lump, but has to sit idly by while it develops into untreatable cancer.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Denise 2009-08-03 17:17
Thanks for posting this information. I found it to be very interesting. I have to agree with another poster, Natalie. Obama is probably starting out big and wil really only get a small part of what he is asking for. I also agree with you totally, in that the government employees shold recieve the same benefits that Obama is proposing for the rest of us. Then my other concern is not being able to afford healthcare for serious illnesses. I owuld never want someone to die becasue of not being provided life saving options. Fascinating post!!! Definitely food for thought.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Lisa 2009-08-03 17:19
I've enjoyed coming back to this post to read all of the different comments & thoughts. I must say I thought of this when my daughter woke up at 12 AM with a fever of 105. How blessed I am to have insurance where I didn't have to think twice about taking her into the doc & letting them go ahead & run several labs. How fortunate I am to get to take her back tomorrow as her fever still isn't breaking. Yes, most likely it's a virus. But because I have insurance I can sleep more soundly knowing I'm doing everything in my power to help her. Without insurance I'd be sitting here worried to pieces about what's happening with her. It's her right as an American child, a child in general, and my right as a mother to be able to take her to the doctor and get her the care she needs. And if it means that I might have to pay more taxes so my child and every other child can have that right, then so be it.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Lisa 2009-08-03 17:20
Have I mentioned how much I've loved reading everyone's thoughts about this heated debate? It is SO important, and it's awesome that you've got so many people thinking. Kudos to you Pauline!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Michelle 2009-08-03 17:51
I think health insurance, like many other things, is really easy to take for granted when you have it and have access to medical care when you need it. Some of the comments have really opened up my eyes to how scary it must be to have a sick child or be sick yourself and not be able to get care because of the astronomical bills. I don't believe in socialism. I do believe we should work hard to earn the things we want...the luxuries, if you will. I just can't consider health care a "luxury" and under the current system, it sort of is.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Wendy 2009-10-04 11:23
So glad I saw this. Even a bigger fan now :)
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# GreenInOC 2009-10-25 22:33
I'm late to this party but after the first four examples shown here by Jill, I'm done researching!

I'm sure that there is a lot to be unhappy about but let's stick to the facts please!

Page 53 - I don't see this as a big deal at all. If one part of our Constitution is deemed illegal (ex: race issues) then the whole cannot be deemed illegal, just that one part.

Page 42 - I do not see any language to support this "claim"

Page 58 - gov't will have real time access to "financial responsibility" meaning who pays what (right now it is a massive undertaking with insurance companies claiming that they aren't responsible, insured having to fight and appeal, etc...).

Page 59 - this is referring to health care PROVIDERS receiving payment for their services, not to individuals.

Oh vey, I would LOVE to engage in a debate about health care that involves facts not fear mongering based in half-truths and outright lies.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# steve 2010-01-02 19:35
you are a fool not to realize that socializm is being rammed down our throats. that govt has no business in my healthcare, that free healthcare is not free, that when you get sick or old the govt will decide what you need not the doctor, who by the way wouldn't take my tonsils out after repeated sore throats and fevers cause if wasn't "recomended anymore". referring to Obama's suggestion that dr.'s do unnecesary procedures. yes i think they do but only to keep from being sued by ambulance chasers. oh yes let's not forget the one thing noone has mentioned. govt sponsered abortion, who will be the voice for the unborn? they cannot speak up for themselves or defend themselves. they are the only true minority. that is not fearmongering that is fact.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# robes 2010-04-05 17:14
cool news.

robe de soirée
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Амин 2010-05-01 03:34
Благодарю, многим думаю инфа была полезна.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# mutuelle 2010-05-09 03:07
Bonjour,
Je vous conseille de lire un site qui parle de mutuelle
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Всеволод 2010-05-18 09:08
Кирилический текст. www.bbcode.ru Tekst na latinece. простая ссылка
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh